|
|
Post by songsmith1950 on Oct 8, 2009 10:31:28 GMT -5
Seems Paul and his Daddy are really shopping for the best deal. I mean the best car or whatever. I guess they are hoping a really good car will turn a less than mediocre driver into a winner.
Bad news - there is not enough money or a good enough car, Paul. . . .
It is becoming clear as his father recites that Pauls driver contract is not transferrable that they don't want to come here.
WE DON'T WANT HIM!
Yes, the money is always good but we have a placemarker already in Sadler and in Reed too this year.
RPM is finding sponsors, as shown by the Dassault Systemes sponsorship of the 44 this week.
I would rather drop to three cars than have Kasey and AJ going for it, Elliot taking Sunday joyrides at his own slow pace and then Little Paulie driving around his daddy's money.
I am sure Childress will take the money and run.
Let them have the money and Paulie both!
|
|
|
|
Post by ricklou on Oct 8, 2009 10:38:00 GMT -5
Elliott's Sunday joy rides ...your cracking me up. Little Paulie.....startin to sound like the Soprano's or somtin ....
I want to see Danica get the big bucks to run Nascar and recieve a BIG Butt Kicking.
|
|
|
|
Post by songsmith1950 on Oct 8, 2009 10:43:06 GMT -5
Me too. I don't think her temper tantrums are going to affect the good old boys very much. Besides that, if I may say so her looks are very over rated.
|
|
|
|
Post by donmoos on Oct 8, 2009 11:07:03 GMT -5
I wouldn't get to excited about Dassault Systems. They were an associate sponsor before RPM.
Based on what they produce, 3D graphic computer programming it was most likely a product provided sponsorship. Much like the transport sponsorships with the likes of Freightliner.
|
|
|
|
Post by songsmith1950 on Oct 8, 2009 12:13:03 GMT -5
Great insight! May very well be so. Even if it was product provided though if we have the same thing F1 teams have it should be really good!
|
|
|
|
Post by chilipepper on Oct 8, 2009 13:54:31 GMT -5
I hope Menard and daddy's money go anywhere but RPM.
|
|
|
|
Post by donmoos on Oct 8, 2009 15:56:36 GMT -5
Great insight! May very well be so. Even if it was product provided though if we have the same thing F1 teams have it should be really good! There was a mention of the product in one of the articles recently, I was not able to find it again. It is some impressive software that the engineers use for parts and graphics. |
|
|
|
Post by pmossberg on Oct 8, 2009 16:00:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by songsmith1950 on Oct 8, 2009 16:18:41 GMT -5
Great finds Paul! That is some really good looking powerful software. No wonder we are gaining on the best so well.
|
|
|
|
Post by dstanbery on Oct 8, 2009 19:11:23 GMT -5
Me too. I don't think her temper tantrums are going to affect the good old boys very much. Besides that, if I may say so her looks are very over rated. Sir,she is Nasty Hott,anyways I would take Danica and her sponsor money before Menards dadddys sponsor money. Would bring alot of exposure to RPM and I will say Quality exposure! Don't tell me you folks would not buy a pink 43 halter top,half shirt,pink short shorts or a pretty lookin 43 hat for your better half! [No MATTER HOW OLD YOU ALL ARE!] |
|
|
|
Post by 4345fan on Oct 8, 2009 19:44:57 GMT -5
Maybe menard will hook up with robby gordon motorsports.I have seen menards sponsorship on he,s car before.Don,t want him at RPM either.
|
|
|
|
Post by songsmith1950 on Oct 9, 2009 6:11:55 GMT -5
Now Brett. . . I hate to say you make some good points but you do. I would have to buy Lovee some pink 43 stuff. But all I am admitting to is that I would rather have Danica than Paul Menard. And don't you ever prove me wrong again!!!!  |
|
|
|
Post by stuck on Oct 9, 2009 9:23:59 GMT -5
Better hope FIRST that the deal with Yates gets signed, sealed and delivered. if that doesn't happen, George has set this team up for big problems way beyond what "Paulie" may or may not bring.
|
|
|
|
Post by revilo on Oct 9, 2009 9:46:35 GMT -5
Very true, stuck. We might be putting the cart before the horse, counting our chickens before they're hatched, or throwing out the baby with the bath water.
|
|
|
|
Post by stuck on Oct 9, 2009 9:55:36 GMT -5
Very true, stuck. We might be putting the cart before the horse, counting our chickens before they're hatched, or throwing out the baby with the bath water. Never count your money 'till the dealin's done...... |
|
